Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Obstet Med ; 17(1): 63-65, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38660326

ABSTRACT

Carotid webs are intraluminal shelf-like projections caused by thickening of the arterial tunica intima. Due to their projections forming a nidus for thrombus formation and subsequent embolus, they are considered to be a rare cause of ischaemic strokes. We report a case of a woman with a background of recurrent ischaemic strokes due to bilateral carotid webs who presented with a twin pregnancy. We use this case to discuss how her pregnancy-related stroke risk was subsequently medically managed.

2.
Clin Med (Lond) ; 21(4): e357-e362, 2021 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35192478

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study's aim was to investigate an association between outcome from in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and increasing burden of comorbidities and frailty. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from contemporaneous patient notes and electronic records of all patients who suffered an in-hospital cardiac arrest between 1 April 2017 and 31 March 2018 in a hospital that includes a tertiary cardiology department. RESULTS: A total of 113 patient records were assessed. Patient frailty was assessed based on calculation of Rockwood clinical frailty score (CFS) and comorbidity assessment based on Charlson comorbidity index (CCI). A linear correlation has been identified between increasing CCI and reduced survival (ANOVA = p<0.001) and rates of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) (ANOVA = 0.013). No patients with a CFS above 6 survived to 1 year. A linear correlation was identified between increasing CFS and reduced probability of ROSC (ANOVA p=0.002), survival to discharge (ANOVA p=0.003) and 1 year (ANOVA p=0.001). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest an association between increasing patient multimorbidity and frailty and poorer outcome post cardiac arrest.


Subject(s)
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation , Frailty , Frailty/epidemiology , Hospitals , Humans , Multimorbidity , Retrospective Studies
3.
J Med Ethics ; 40(3): 157-62, 2014 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23533055

ABSTRACT

This paper discusses the views of 17 healthcare practitioners involved with transplantation on the ethics of live liver donations (LLDs). Donations between emotionally related donor and recipients (especially from parents to their children) increased the acceptability of an LLD compared with those between strangers. Most healthcare professionals (HCPs) disapproved of altruistic stranger donations, considering them to entail an unacceptable degree of risk taking. Participants tended to emphasise the need to balance the harms of proceeding against those of not proceeding, rather than calculating the harm-to-benefits ratio of donor versus recipient. Participants' views suggested that a complex process of negotiation is required, which respects the autonomy of donor, recipient and HCP. Although they considered that, of the three, donor autonomy is of primary importance, they also placed considerable weight on their own autonomy. Our participants suggest that their opinions about acceptable risk taking were more objective than those of the recipient or donor and were therefore given greater weight. However, it was clear that more subjective values were also influential. Processes used in live kidney donation (LKD) were thought to be a good model for LLD, but our participants stressed that there is a danger that patients may underestimate the risks involved in LLD if it is too closely associated with LKD.


Subject(s)
Hepatectomy/ethics , Living Donors , Nephrectomy/ethics , Personal Autonomy , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/ethics , Risk-Taking , Tissue and Organ Procurement/ethics , Altruism , Comprehension , Family , Hepatectomy/adverse effects , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Kidney Transplantation/ethics , Liver Transplantation/ethics , Living Donors/psychology , Nephrectomy/adverse effects
4.
Eur J Emerg Med ; 20(3): 214-7, 2013 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22955474

ABSTRACT

There is increased demand for emergency healthcare by the public when abroad. This study aimed to investigate adults' reported level of knowledge about how to contact emergency healthcare services while abroad. A street survey was administered at various times, over several days, to 554 members of the general public who had been abroad in the previous 18 months. Only 33.6% [95% confidence interval (29.6%-37.7%)] of respondents reported that they knew the emergency medical number for the country last visited. This did not differ by sex (34.2% males vs. 33% females). Those fluent in the language of the country last visited were more likely to report knowing the emergency number for that country (54%), compared with those who were not (24.8%) (P<0.001). It is concerning that the majority of the general public do not appear to know how to contact emergency medical services while abroad. More targeted health education campaigns that address this are needed.


Subject(s)
Emergency Medical Services , Health Services Accessibility , Travel , Female , Health Education , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Health Services Accessibility/organization & administration , Humans , Language , Male , Medically Uninsured , Telephone/economics , United Kingdom
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...